Golang 合并byte 的性能比较

🕟 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 by GolangNote

Golang 合并byte 的性能比较

concat.go

package concat

func concatCopyPreAllocate(slices [][]byte) []byte {
    var totalLen int
    for _, s := range slices {
        totalLen += len(s)
    }
    tmp := make([]byte, totalLen)
    var i int
    for _, s := range slices {
        i += copy(tmp[i:], s)
    }
    return tmp
}

func concatAppend(slices [][]byte) []byte {
    var tmp []byte
    for _, s := range slices {
        tmp = append(tmp, s...)
    }
    return tmp
}

concat_test.go

package concat

import "testing"

var slices = [][]byte{
    []byte("my first slice"),
    []byte("second slice"),
    []byte("third slice"),
    []byte("fourth slice"),
    []byte("fifth slice"),
}

var B []byte

func BenchmarkConcatCopyPreAllocate(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        B = concatCopyPreAllocate(slices)
    }
}

func BenchmarkConcatAppend(b *testing.B) {
    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        B = concatAppend(slices)
    }
}

运行结果：

$ go test . -bench=. -benchmem
goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
BenchmarkConcatCopyPreAllocate-8   	20000000	        59.2 ns/op	      64 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkConcatAppend-8            	10000000	       128 ns/op	     112 B/op	       3 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	_/Users/yourname/tmp/golang/concat	2.683s

Golang 合并byte 的性能比较

Be the first to comment!

Relative Articles

Recent Go Articles

Top Go Articles